EVO vs. CIBR

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

EVO (Evotec SE ADR) is a stock, while CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Over the past 10 years, EVO returned 2.74%/yr vs 18.35%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EVO vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evotec SE ADR (EVO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVO achieves a -9.58% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EVO has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 2.74%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.35% annualized return.

EVO

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: -23.91%
• YTD: -9.58%
• 1Y: -31.57%
• 3Y*: -38.39%
• 5Y*: -33.67%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

CIBR

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 7.77%
• 6M: 26.97%
• YTD: 28.93%
• 1Y: 27.27%
• 3Y*: 26.90%
• 5Y*: 14.19%
• 10Y*: 18.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVO vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVO Evotec SE ADR	-9.58%	-25.96%	-64.54%	44.99%	-65.94%	29.45%	42.78%	29.05%	24.08%	106.17%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.93%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EVO and CIBR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.26

Return for Risk

EVO vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVO

EVO Risk / Return Rank: 17
EVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
EVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EVO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EVO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 30
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVO vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evotec SE ADR (EVO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVO	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.00	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	1.50	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.19	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	1.16	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	2.68	-4.00

EVO vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVO and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVO vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVO drawdown since its inception was -91.29%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVO and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVO	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.29%	-33.89%	-57.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.77%	-21.99%	-23.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.71%	-21.99%	-60.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.29%	-33.89%	-57.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.29%	-33.89%	-57.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.50%	-2.52%	-86.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.05%	-8.65%	-25.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.18%	9.47%	+15.71%

Volatility

EVO vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Evotec SE ADR (EVO) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.55%. This indicates that EVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVO	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.57%	7.55%	+4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.23%	22.23%	+18.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.31%	25.79%	+27.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.75%	25.20%	+33.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.65%	23.58%	+28.07%

Dividends

EVO vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

EVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
EVO Evotec SE ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVO and CIBR in my portfolio?

EVO and CIBR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVO or CIBR?

EVO has higher volatility (11.57%) compared to CIBR (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVO dropped -91.29% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.