EVO vs. FLIN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EVO (Evotec SE ADR) is a stock, while FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) is India Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, EVO returned -37.73%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for FLIN. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

EVO vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evotec SE ADR (EVO) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVO achieves a -37.99% return, which is significantly lower than FLIN's -7.54% return.

EVO

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -34.14%
• 6M: -47.67%
• YTD: -37.99%
• 1Y: -52.49%
• 3Y*: -47.31%
• 5Y*: -37.73%
• 10Y*: -1.89%
• ALL TIME*: 1.16%

FLIN

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: -3.67%
• YTD: -7.54%
• 1Y: -5.26%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: 4.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVO Evotec SE ADR	$102.03K	$137.11K	$133.87K
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	$22.41M	$27.89M	$27.53M

EVO vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EVO Evotec SE ADR	-37.99%	-25.96%	-64.54%	44.99%	-65.94%	29.45%	42.78%	29.05%	11.41%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-7.54%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-7.96%	24.96%	14.50%	4.77%	-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EVO and FLIN is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.23

Return for Risk

EVO vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVO

EVO Risk / Return Rank: 5
EVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EVO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
EVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 6
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVO vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evotec SE ADR (EVO) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVO	FLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	-0.33	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.41	-0.38	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.96	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	-0.28	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.97	-0.62	-1.34

EVO vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVO and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVO vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVO drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVO and FLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVO	FLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.80%	-41.90%	-50.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.98%	-18.25%	-35.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.91%	-22.85%	-62.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.80%	-22.85%	-69.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.80%	-14.88%	-77.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-8.16%	-26.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.47%	8.17%	+18.30%

Volatility

EVO vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

Evotec SE ADR (EVO) has a higher volatility of 19.51% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 4.09%. This indicates that EVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVO	FLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.51%	4.09%	+15.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.49%	13.21%	+30.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.17%	15.36%	+38.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.31%	15.83%	+43.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.99%	20.35%	+31.64%

Dividends

EVO vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

EVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EVO Evotec SE ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.43%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVO and FLIN in my portfolio?

EVO and FLIN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVO or FLIN?

EVO has higher volatility (19.51%) compared to FLIN (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVO dropped -92.80% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.