EVO vs. FLIN
EVO (Evotec SE ADR) is a stock, while FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, EVO returned -34.55%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for FLIN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EVO vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVO achieves a -14.94% return, which is significantly lower than FLIN's -6.84% return.
EVO
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -13.53%
- YTD
- -14.94%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- -39.19%
- 5Y*
- -34.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
FLIN
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- -6.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
EVO vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVO Evotec SE ADR | -14.94% | -25.96% | -64.54% | 44.99% | -65.94% | 29.45% | 42.78% | 29.05% | 11.41% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -6.84% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVO and FLIN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVO vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
EVO
FLIN
EVO vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evotec SE ADR (EVO) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVO | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.34 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.79 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVO vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVO drawdown since its inception was -91.29%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVO and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVO | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.29% | -41.90% | -49.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.77% | -18.79% | -27.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.71% | -22.85% | -59.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.29% | -22.85% | -68.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.12% | -14.23% | -75.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.88% | -8.06% | -25.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.10% | 8.07% | +17.03% |
Volatility
EVO vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Evotec SE ADR (EVO) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 4.22%. This indicates that EVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVO | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.21% | 4.22% | +10.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.39% | 13.13% | +28.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.82% | 15.12% | +38.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.77% | 15.77% | +43.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.65% | 20.42% | +31.23% |
Dividends
EVO vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
EVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVO Evotec SE ADR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.42% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVO and FLIN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVO has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to FLIN (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVO dropped -91.29% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
FLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVO and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer