PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVMT vs. TILL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVMT vs. TILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than TILL's 8.44% return.


EVMT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-5.32%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
3.86%
1Y
29.36%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
10Y*

TILL

1D
0.93%
1M
5.10%
6M
7.73%
YTD
8.44%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
-5.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EVMT
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.86%30.61%-10.50%-27.71%-5.73%
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
8.44%-5.97%-13.98%-5.00%-11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and TILL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVMT vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT
EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TILL
TILL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVMTTILLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.06

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.43

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

0.94

+7.05

EVMT vs. TILL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the TILL Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and TILL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and TILL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVMTTILLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.34%

-33.76%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-9.87%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.38%

-29.46%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.30%

-27.23%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-21.57%

-12.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

4.47%

-0.95%

Volatility

EVMT vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) at 4.18%. This indicates that EVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVMTTILLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.18%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

10.74%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

12.56%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

14.73%

+5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

14.73%

+5.68%

EVMT vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVMT vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.36%, more than TILL's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EVMT
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
11.36%11.80%3.62%5.49%0.86%
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
4.58%4.97%2.55%51.24%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVMT and TILL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVMT has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to TILL (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs TILL's -33.76%.

On 3-year performance, EVMT leads with 0.45% vs -5.44% for TILL. On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EVMT has performed better with a 0.45% return vs -5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.36%, compared with 4.58% for TILL.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.89% for TILL.

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVMT and TILL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer