EVMT vs. TILL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EVMT returned 0.32%/yr vs -6.08%/yr for TILL. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.

Performance

EVMT vs. TILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than TILL's 8.16% return.

EVMT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 1Y: 30.34%
• 3Y*: 0.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -6.97%

TILL

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 3.21%
• 6M: 7.87%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: -6.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -7.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	$34.42K	$27.21K	$65.95K
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	$881.52K	$637.13K	$1.68M

EVMT vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.75%	30.61%	-10.50%	-27.71%	-5.73%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.16%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-5.00%	-11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and TILL is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022	0.21

The correlation between EVMT and TILL shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 21
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVMT vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVMT	TILL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	0.45	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	0.74	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.08	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	0.59	+2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	1.54	+5.71

EVMT vs. TILL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the TILL Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and TILL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and TILL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	TILL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-33.76%	-14.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.35%	-9.87%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.49%	-25.33%	-1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.69%	-27.41%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-21.63%	-12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	3.80%	+0.38%

Volatility

EVMT vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) is 2.13%, while Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that EVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	TILL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	5.26%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	11.28%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	13.07%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	14.76%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	14.76%	+5.52%

EVMT vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than TILL's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	11.27%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.59%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and TILL in my portfolio?

EVMT and TILL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or TILL?

TILL has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to EVMT (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs TILL's -33.76%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or TILL?

On 3-year performance, EVMT leads with 0.32% vs -6.08% for TILL. On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EVMT has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or TILL?

Over the 3-year period, EVMT has performed better with a 0.32% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or TILL?

EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or TILL?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 4.59% for TILL.

What is the main difference between EVMT and TILL?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.89% for TILL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.