EVMT vs. UNHU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.

Performance

EVMT vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EVMT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 1Y: 30.34%
• 3Y*: 0.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -6.97%

UNHU

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -5.55%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	$34.42K	$27.21K	$65.95K
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	$242.22K	$340.07K	$288.24K

EVMT vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.27%
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	124.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and UNHU is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026	-0.05

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. UNHU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

UNHU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVMT vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVMT	UNHU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	—	—

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and UNHU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	UNHU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-11.68%	-36.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.69%	-10.05%	-17.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-3.04%	-31.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	UNHU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	62.18%	-46.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	62.18%	-41.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	62.18%	-41.90%

EVMT vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than UNHU's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	11.27%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and UNHU in my portfolio?

EVMT and UNHU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or UNHU?

On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or UNHU?

EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or UNHU?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 0.45% for UNHU.

What is the main difference between EVMT and UNHU?

EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while UNHU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.97% for UNHU.