EVMT vs. UNHU
EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.
Performance
EVMT vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EVMT
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 41.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHU
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMT vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 10.04% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 86.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVMT and UNHU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVMT vs. UNHU — Risk / Return Rank
EVMT
UNHU
EVMT vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVMT | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.79 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVMT | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 40.88 | -41.15 |
Drawdowns
EVMT vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and UNHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVMT | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -11.63% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.69% | -11.63% | -10.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -2.81% | -31.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
EVMT vs. UNHU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVMT | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 68.06% | -52.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 68.06% | -47.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 68.06% | -47.55% |
EVMT vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVMT vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison
EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, while UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 10.40% | 11.80% | 3.62% | 5.49% | 0.86% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVMT and UNHU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.
EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.
EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while UNHU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.97% for UNHU.
Find the right allocation for EVMT and UNHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer