EVFTX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
EVFTX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on May 25, 2016. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFTX E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund | -2.29% | 12.51% | 6.21% | 8.70% | -11.39% | 4.13% | 12.91% | 16.84% | -8.93% | 3.89% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVFTX achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's -3.62% return.
EVFTX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVFTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVFTX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
EVFTX
PALDX
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVFTX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.65 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.42 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 6.83 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVFTX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.67 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.71 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVFTX and PALDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
EVFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than PALDX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFTX E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund | 4.71% | 4.60% | 1.06% | 2.83% | 1.66% | 12.53% | 0.71% | 1.14% | 6.85% | 6.80% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVFTX drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFTX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVFTX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.47% | -26.16% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -8.20% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.06% | -20.47% | +4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -5.96% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.16% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.70% | -0.20% |
Volatility
EVFTX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 3.05%. This indicates that EVFTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVFTX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.05% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 5.86% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.01% | 11.52% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.38% | 12.08% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.79% | 12.75% | -3.96% |