PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVFTX vs. EVFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFTX achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than EVFCX's 5.82% return.


EVFTX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.85%
YTD
8.02%
6M
8.61%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*

EVFCX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.15%
YTD
5.82%
6M
6.22%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVFTX
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund
8.02%12.51%6.21%8.70%-11.39%4.13%12.91%16.84%-8.93%11.51%
EVFCX
E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund
5.82%10.49%3.43%6.73%-9.65%1.78%10.84%12.57%-4.42%9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFTX and EVFCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.93

The correlation between EVFTX and EVFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVFTX vs. EVFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFTX
EVFTX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EVFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EVFCX
EVFCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EVFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVFTXEVFCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.37

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

3.47

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.03

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.31

13.16

+0.15

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the EVFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFTX and EVFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVFTXEVFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.37

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.72

-0.03

Drawdowns

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFTX drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, which is greater than EVFCX's maximum drawdown of -19.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFTX and EVFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFTXEVFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.47%

-19.11%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-4.52%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-7.50%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.06%

-13.38%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.56%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.04%

+0.31%

Volatility

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) at 2.10%. This indicates that EVFTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVFTXEVFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.10%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

4.89%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.81%

5.78%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

5.72%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

6.57%

+2.25%

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EVFCX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVFTX vs. EVFCX - Dividend Comparison

EVFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than EVFCX's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVFCX
E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund
2.67%2.83%1.81%3.66%2.06%12.38%1.68%2.17%6.26%4.47%0.76%
EVFTX
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund
4.26%4.60%1.06%2.83%1.66%12.53%0.71%1.14%6.85%6.80%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EVFTX and EVFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EVFTX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to EVFCX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFTX dropped -24.47% vs EVFCX's -19.11%.

EVFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVFTX and EVFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer