EVFGX vs. BLNDX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EVFGX (E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, EVFGX returned 7.71%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for BLNDX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVFGX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.

Performance

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than BLNDX's 10.34% return.

EVFGX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 25.04%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

BLNDX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 9.16%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 9.87%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund	11.54%	19.07%	9.32%	15.33%	-15.99%	11.00%	19.54%	0.25%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	10.34%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFGX and BLNDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019	0.68

The correlation between EVFGX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVFGX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFGX

EVFGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
EVFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EVFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EVFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EVFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EVFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 78
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVFGX	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.14	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.82	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	3.98	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.76	15.73	-4.97

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFGX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and BLNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVFGX	BLNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-17.69%	-15.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-6.90%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.45%	-17.69%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.37%	-17.69%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.23%	-6.90%	+4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-3.20%	-2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.74%	+0.56%

Volatility

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 3.87%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVFGX	BLNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	3.87%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	10.04%	+2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.28%	12.87%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	11.73%	+3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	11.78%	+3.90%

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVFGX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.38%, more than BLNDX's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.67%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund	17.38%	19.39%	0.00%	1.37%	0.96%	17.87%	2.97%	0.74%	8.11%	9.49%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVFGX and BLNDX in my portfolio?

EVFGX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVFGX or BLNDX?

EVFGX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to BLNDX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFGX dropped -33.61% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.