PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EVFGX vs. EVGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EVFGX vs. EVGRX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX).

EVFGX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. EVGRX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012.

Performance

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund		-0.67%19.07%9.32%15.33%-15.99%11.00%19.54%24.65%-11.29%19.61%
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund		-0.78%17.21%9.46%13.75%-15.04%8.67%19.99%22.25%-9.56%18.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly higher than EVGRX's -0.78% return.

EVFGX

1D
3.19%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
1.75%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
—

EVGRX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
1.23%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund

Often compared with EVFGX:
EVFGX vs. FZROXEVFGX vs. EVFMXEVFGX vs. EVVCXEVFGX vs. EVFTXEVFGX vs. EVFCXEVFGX vs. BERIXEVFGX vs. AVEFX
Often compared with EVGRX:
EVGRX vs. EVFCXEVGRX vs. EVFTXEVGRX vs. EVFMXEVGRX vs. EVVCXEVGRX vs. SCLAXEVGRX vs. STDAXEVGRX vs. BERIX

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EVGRX's 0.98% expense ratio.

EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund

Return for Risk

EVFGX vs. EVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EVFGX
EVFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EVFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
EVGRX
EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EVFGXEVGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.27

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.83

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.85

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

8.03

+0.16

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the EVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFGX and EVGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EVFGXEVGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.27

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between EVFGX and EVGRX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Dividend Comparison

EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.52%, more than EVGRX's 19.23% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund		19.52%19.39%0.00%1.37%0.96%17.87%2.97%0.74%8.11%9.49%0.31%
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund		19.23%19.08%0.13%1.88%1.48%20.40%5.41%1.08%10.83%9.95%0.47%

Drawdowns

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than EVGRX's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and EVGRX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EVFGXEVGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-31.15%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-10.15%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-22.72%

-1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-6.21%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-4.82%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.33%

+0.29%

Volatility

EVFGX vs. EVGRX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) at 5.81%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EVFGXEVGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

5.81%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

9.22%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

14.61%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

12.49%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

13.43%

+2.22%