EVFGX vs. EVFCX
Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX).
EVFGX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. EVFCX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012.
Performance
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund | -3.75% | 19.07% | 9.32% | 15.33% | -15.99% | 11.00% | 19.54% | 24.65% | -11.29% | 19.61% |
EVFCX E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund | -1.75% | 10.49% | 3.43% | 6.73% | -9.65% | 1.78% | 10.84% | 12.57% | -4.42% | 9.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than EVFCX's -1.75% return.
EVFGX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EVFCX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EVFCX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVFGX vs. EVFCX — Risk / Return Rank
EVFGX
EVFCX
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVFGX | EVFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.81 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.74 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 6.93 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVFGX | EVFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.39 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVFGX and EVFCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Dividend Comparison
EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.14%, more than EVFCX's 2.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund | 20.14% | 19.39% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 17.87% | 2.97% | 0.74% | 8.11% | 9.49% | 0.31% |
EVFCX E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund | 2.88% | 2.83% | 1.81% | 3.66% | 2.06% | 12.38% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 6.26% | 4.47% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than EVFCX's maximum drawdown of -19.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and EVFCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVFGX | EVFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -19.11% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -4.54% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -13.38% | -10.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -4.52% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -3.61% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.14% | +1.44% |
Volatility
EVFGX vs. EVFCX - Volatility Comparison
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) at 2.65%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVFGX | EVFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 2.65% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 4.18% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 6.48% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 5.58% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 6.54% | +9.08% |