EUM vs. SQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ).
EUM and SQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%). It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. SQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both EUM and SQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EUM vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EUM vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | -4.65% | -22.61% | -0.83% | -3.89% | 21.11% | -1.32% | -24.37% | -15.27% | 14.60% | -28.08% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 13.99% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than SQQQ's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -8.57%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -52.71% annualized return.
EUM
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- -4.65%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- 1Y
- -23.48%
- 3Y*
- -10.11%
- 5Y*
- -2.28%
- 10Y*
- -8.57%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- -56.13%
- 3Y*
- -49.39%
- 5Y*
- -42.70%
- 10Y*
- -52.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUM vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUM and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
EUM vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EUM
SQQQ
EUM vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | -0.84 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | -1.14 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | -0.76 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | -0.87 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | -0.84 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.64 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.42 | -0.80 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | -0.85 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between EUM and SQQQ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EUM vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SQQQ's 5.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | 3.74% | 3.98% | 4.22% | 3.86% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 1.35% | 0.88% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 5.99% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Drawdowns
EUM vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -92.17%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and SQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.17% | -100.00% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.57% | -75.23% | +36.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.51% | -95.36% | +51.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.06% | -99.96% | +34.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.40% | -100.00% | +8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.02% | -92.32% | +15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.03% | 65.40% | -39.37% |
Volatility
EUM vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is 9.82%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.98%. This indicates that EUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EUM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | 19.98% | -10.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 38.23% | -22.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 67.38% | -46.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 66.65% | -48.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 65.97% | -45.63% |