EUM vs. SPY
EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUM returned -10.88%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. EUM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
EUM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -24.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -10.88%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
EUM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- -24.55%
- 6M
- -25.44%
- 1Y
- -35.38%
- 3Y*
- -17.17%
- 5Y*
- -6.28%
- 10Y*
- -10.88%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
EUM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | -24.55% | -22.61% | -0.83% | -3.89% | 21.11% | -1.32% | -24.37% | -15.27% | 14.60% | -28.08% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUM and SPY is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2007 | -0.74 |
The correlation between EUM and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUM
SPY
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EUM
SPY
Basic Materials
EUM
-
SPY
Communication Services
EUM
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
EUM
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
EUM
-
SPY
Energy
EUM
-
SPY
Healthcare
EUM
-
SPY
Industrials
EUM
-
SPY
Real Estate
EUM
-
SPY
Technology
EUM
-
SPY
Utilities
EUM
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
EUM
SPY
EUM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.39 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | 3.01 | -4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.97 | 13.54 | -15.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -55.19% | -38.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.91% | -8.88% | -26.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -18.76% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.87% | -24.50% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.81% | -33.72% | -35.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.19% | -1.75% | -91.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -9.04% | -68.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.47% | 1.97% | +16.50% |
Volatility
EUM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that EUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.98% | 4.64% | +6.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 9.75% | +10.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 12.43% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 17.14% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 17.99% | +2.74% |
EUM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.73% | 3.98% | 4.22% | 3.86% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 1.35% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUM and SPY have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUM has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.19% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs -10.88% for EUM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs -10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EUM.
EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EUM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EUM and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer