ETCO vs. GAVA
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GAVA.
Performance
ETCO vs. GAVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETCO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -29.56%
- 6M
- -27.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO vs. GAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -4.75% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -12.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and GAVA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. GAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCO | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.11 | -0.94 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. GAVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, which is greater than GAVA's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and GAVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.81% | -18.61% | -38.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.70% | -18.61% | -33.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -8.80% | -25.53% |
Volatility
ETCO vs. GAVA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.29% | 49.54% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 49.54% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 49.54% | +2.75% |
ETCO vs. GAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GAVA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. GAVA - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.50%, while GAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 120.50% | 42.29% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and GAVA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 120.50%, compared with 0.00% for GAVA.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 0.35% for GAVA.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and GAVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer