PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETCG vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETCG vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -35.40% return, which is significantly lower than BTC's -25.36% return.


ETCG

1D
1.15%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-35.40%
6M
-44.65%
1Y
-51.42%
3Y*
-10.63%
5Y*
-35.81%
10Y*

BTC

1D
-2.73%
1M
-18.40%
YTD
-25.36%
6M
-29.74%
1Y
-38.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCG vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-35.40%-39.78%3.56%
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-25.36%-7.50%44.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and BTC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.65

The correlation between ETCG and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETCG vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCG vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETCGBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.83

-0.89

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.32

-1.22

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.86

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.78

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.36

+0.18

ETCG vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is comparable to the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETCGBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

-0.89

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

-0.00

-0.18

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETCGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.59%

-49.34%

-47.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.46%

-49.34%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.33%

-47.98%

-47.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.67%

-16.61%

-66.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.41%

28.38%

+15.03%

Volatility

ETCG vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 9.40%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETCGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

9.40%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.81%

34.45%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.03%

43.69%

+18.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.03%

48.30%

+45.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.33%

48.30%

+67.03%

ETCG vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETCG vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETCG nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETCG and BTC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETCG has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to BTC (9.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs BTC's -49.34%.

On 1-year performance, BTC leads with -38.61% vs -51.42% for ETCG. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTC has performed better with a -38.61% return vs -51.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

ETCG and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.15% for BTC.

ETCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETCG and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer