ETCG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ETCG is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -59.15% vs 252.57% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -38.98% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -31.95% return.

ETCG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.70%
• 6M: -45.78%
• YTD: -38.98%
• 1Y: -59.15%
• 3Y*: -19.19%
• 5Y*: -32.50%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 46.79%
• 6M: 0.09%
• YTD: -31.95%
• 1Y: 252.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-38.98%	-39.78%	30.70%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.95%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and MSTZ is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.53

The correlation between ETCG and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETCG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 2
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	1.71	-2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	2.37	-4.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.31	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	3.00	-3.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	5.79	-7.00

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-99.38%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.23%	-84.89%	+15.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.59%	-97.68%	+2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.80%	-94.55%	+11.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.94%	43.81%	+5.13%

Volatility

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) is 11.22%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.66%. This indicates that ETCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETCG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	56.66%	-45.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.23%	135.05%	-98.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.68%	148.51%	-86.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.85%	170.85%	-79.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.62%	170.85%	-56.23%

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETCG nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ETCG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETCG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.66%) compared to ETCG (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ETCG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 252.57% vs -59.15% for ETCG. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 11.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETCG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 252.57% return vs -59.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCG or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCG or MSTZ?

ETCG and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETCG and MSTZ?

ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.