ETCG vs. GAVA
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCG is passively managed, while GAVA is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GAVA.
Performance
ETCG vs. GAVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETCG
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -37.40%
- 6M
- -45.61%
- 1Y
- -53.60%
- 3Y*
- -8.79%
- 5Y*
- -36.21%
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG vs. GAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -9.98% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -18.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and GAVA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. GAVA — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
GAVA
ETCG vs. GAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETCG | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCG | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -1.21 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. GAVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than GAVA's maximum drawdown of -24.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and GAVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -24.10% | -72.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.47% | -24.10% | -71.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.67% | -9.29% | -73.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.62% | — | — |
Volatility
ETCG vs. GAVA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.10% | 49.58% | +12.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.02% | 49.58% | +44.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.30% | 49.58% | +65.72% |
ETCG vs. GAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GAVA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. GAVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETCG nor GAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and GAVA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ETCG and GAVA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.35% for GAVA.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and GAVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer