ET vs. NPCT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock, while NPCT (Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Nuveen. Over the past 5 years, ET returned 21.43%/yr vs -3.28%/yr for NPCT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ET vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than NPCT's 1.19% return.

ET

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 21.54%
• 6M: 19.30%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 24.40%
• 5Y*: 21.43%
• 10Y*: 13.08%

NPCT

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: -3.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ET vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ET Energy Transfer LP	21.54%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	0.41%
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund	1.19%	9.87%	17.23%	7.78%	-37.50%	-4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ET and NPCT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021	0.14

The correlation between ET and NPCT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ET vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 69
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 70

NPCT

NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 6
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ET vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ET	NPCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.34	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	0.59	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.07	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	0.49	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	1.22	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ET vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and NPCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ET	NPCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.34	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	-0.25	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	-0.27	+0.63

Drawdowns

ET vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than NPCT's maximum drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and NPCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ET	NPCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.81%	-46.77%	-41.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-6.79%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-12.59%	-11.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.82%	-46.77%	+20.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-17.85%	+12.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.74%	-25.21%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	2.73%	+1.84%

Volatility

ET vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) at 3.31%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ET	NPCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	3.31%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	7.20%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	9.80%	+6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.87%	13.12%	+11.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.02%	13.07%	+21.95%

Dividends

ET vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than NPCT's 12.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.90%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund	12.62%	13.15%	12.20%	10.28%	11.93%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ET and NPCT in my portfolio?

ET and NPCT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ET or NPCT?

ET has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to NPCT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs NPCT's -46.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.