ESPR vs. ZIM
ESPR (Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. ESPR operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ZIM operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ESPR returned -31.52%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for ZIM. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESPR vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPR achieves a -15.14% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 19.30% return.
ESPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- -15.14%
- 6M
- -16.93%
- 1Y
- 199.05%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- -31.52%
- 10Y*
- -15.52%
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPR vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPR Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. | -15.14% | 68.18% | -26.42% | -52.01% | 24.60% | -84.43% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 19.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPR and ZIM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between ESPR and ZIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESPR:
$789.25M
ZIM:
$2.95B
ESPR:
-$0.03
ZIM:
$0.81
ESPR:
1.75
ZIM:
0.47
ESPR:
$418.24M
ZIM:
$6.29B
ESPR:
$226.32M
ZIM:
$676.00M
ESPR:
$77.18M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPR vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
ESPR
ZIM
ESPR vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPR | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 1.77 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 4.29 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPR | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.03 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.32 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.75 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
ESPR vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPR drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPR and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPR | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.37% | -84.68% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.19% | -30.66% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.94% | -57.12% | -23.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.23% | -84.68% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.28% | -14.19% | -83.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -40.05% | -29.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.00% | 12.65% | +8.35% |
Volatility
ESPR vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) is 1.30%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that ESPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPR | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 14.70% | -13.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.84% | 37.41% | +24.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.06% | 53.01% | +41.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.97% | 65.89% | +26.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.71% | 67.72% | +16.99% |
Dividends
ESPR vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
ESPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPR Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 5.10% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% |
Financials
ESPR vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESPR vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
ESPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
ESPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.58M and revenue of 80.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
ESPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. reported a net income of -25.20M and revenue of 80.10M, resulting in a net margin of -31.5%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPR and ZIM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to ESPR (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPR dropped -99.37% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
ESPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPR and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer