PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPO vs. WRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPO vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's -2.51% return.


ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.01%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*

WRB

1D
1.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.17%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.10%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-2.51%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and WRB is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.13

The correlation between ESPO and WRB shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPO vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESPOWRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.98

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

-0.29

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-0.54

-0.40

ESPO vs. WRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and WRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and WRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPOWRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-69.33%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.81%

-17.62%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

-17.62%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

-26.29%

-22.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.19%

-11.49%

-15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-14.58%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

9.29%

+6.66%

Volatility

ESPO vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPOWRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

7.63%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

15.08%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

21.37%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

22.83%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

24.56%

+1.15%

Dividends

ESPO vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than WRB's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.72%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESPO and WRB have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs WRB's -69.33%.

WRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO and WRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer