ESPO vs. VUG
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 6.23%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
ESPO vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
ESPO vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and VUG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ESPO and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPO vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
VUG
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
ESPO
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
VUG
Technology
ESPO
VUG
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
VUG
Energy
ESPO
-
VUG
Financial Services
ESPO
-
VUG
Healthcare
ESPO
-
VUG
Industrials
ESPO
-
VUG
Real Estate
ESPO
-
VUG
Utilities
ESPO
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
VUG
ESPO vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.69 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 5.92 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 1.77 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -50.68% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -16.53% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -22.85% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -35.61% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -1.51% | -24.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -7.09% | -7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 4.71% | +10.59% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.83% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 12.11% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 15.84% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 22.22% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 21.44% | +4.31% |
ESPO vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and VUG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 6.23% for ESPO. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer