ESPO vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.49%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for AUSF. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

ESPO vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than AUSF's 9.27% return.

ESPO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: -15.10%
• 6M: -16.17%
• 1Y: -14.01%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: —

AUSF

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: 17.75%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	-15.10%	25.79%	47.61%	33.64%	-34.71%	-2.13%	83.93%	42.36%	-12.49%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	9.27%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and AUSF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.43

The correlation between ESPO and AUSF shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESPO vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESPO	AUSF
Technology	56.2%	15.3%
Communication Services	29.4%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	9.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.8%
Energy	-	3.2%
Financial Services	-	18.4%
Healthcare	-	11.4%
Industrials	-	14.4%
Real Estate	-	4.6%
Utilities	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

ESPO vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO

ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 4
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 57
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESPO	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	1.65	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	2.38	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.28	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	2.86	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	8.29	-9.22

ESPO vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESPO	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-44.25%	-6.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.81%	-5.84%	-21.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.81%	-12.29%	-15.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.33%	-14.23%	-34.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.19%	0.00%	-27.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-4.21%	-10.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.95%	2.02%	+13.93%

Volatility

ESPO vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.70%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESPO	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	2.70%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.67%	6.72%	+7.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.83%	10.14%	+8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	13.66%	+11.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.71%	19.04%	+6.67%

ESPO vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESPO vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than AUSF's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.69%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	1.47%	1.24%	0.44%	0.96%	0.91%	3.36%	0.12%	0.22%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESPO and AUSF in my portfolio?

ESPO and AUSF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESPO or AUSF?

ESPO has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to AUSF (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, ESPO or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 13.35% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESPO or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESPO or AUSF?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESPO or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.

What is the main difference between ESPO and AUSF?

ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AUSF is Mid Cap Value Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.