PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESML vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESML vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 14.55% return.


ESML

1D
0.75%
1M
3.07%
YTD
17.14%
6M
16.21%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*

IVOO

1D
0.36%
1M
2.93%
YTD
14.55%
6M
14.27%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESML vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
17.14%10.62%12.01%17.27%-17.28%19.28%19.56%29.12%-10.89%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.55%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ESML and IVOO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.97

The correlation between ESML and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESML vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESML
IVOO

Industrials

19.3%
25.1%

Technology

17.5%
15.7%

Financial Services

14.4%
14.4%

Healthcare

12.6%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.7%

Real Estate

6.5%
7.5%

Energy

5.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.8%

Utilities

2.7%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.0%

Industrials

ESML
19.3%
IVOO
25.1%

Technology

ESML
17.5%
IVOO
15.7%

Financial Services

ESML
14.4%
IVOO
14.4%

Healthcare

ESML
12.6%
IVOO
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESML
11.3%
IVOO
10.7%

Real Estate

ESML
6.5%
IVOO
7.5%

Energy

ESML
5.9%
IVOO
5.5%

Basic Materials

ESML
3.9%
IVOO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESML
3.7%
IVOO
3.8%

Utilities

ESML
2.7%
IVOO
3.1%

Communication Services

ESML
2.2%
IVOO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESML vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESML vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMLIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

2.98

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

10.90

+3.62

ESML vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESML Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESML and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMLIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.69

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.42

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.62

-0.15

Drawdowns

ESML vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMLIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-42.33%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-8.81%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-24.22%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-24.22%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-5.27%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.41%

+0.04%

Volatility

ESML vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMLIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.24%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

11.35%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

15.52%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

19.72%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

21.19%

+2.21%

ESML vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESML vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
0.94%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ESML and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to ESML (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 5-year performance, IVOO leads with 8.23% vs 7.34% for ESML. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ESML.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.94% for ESML.

ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.10% for IVOO.

ESML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESML and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer