ESLG vs. FITZ
ESLG (Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESLG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
ESLG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESLG
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESLG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 5.31% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLG and FITZ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESLG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLG drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLG and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -7.37% | -4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -3.47% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -3.97% | +0.76% |
Volatility
ESLG vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLG | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 16.22% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 16.22% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 16.22% | +0.51% |
ESLG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESLG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESLG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.27% | 0.04% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESLG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESLG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESLG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
ESLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESLG and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for ESLG and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer