PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLG vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESLG vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLG achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.72% return.


ESLG

1D
-0.65%
1M
9.19%
YTD
13.42%
6M
12.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-0.73%
1M
12.07%
YTD
30.72%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLG vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ESLG
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF
13.42%-0.42%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
30.72%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLG and GARY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLG vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESLG vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESLGGARYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

4.42

-3.17

Drawdowns

ESLG vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLG drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLG and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLGGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-10.28%

-2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.73%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-1.69%

-1.72%

Volatility

ESLG vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLGGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

19.25%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

19.25%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

19.25%

-3.44%

ESLG vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESLG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESLG vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ESLG
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF
0.15%0.04%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESLG and GARY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESLG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESLG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

ESLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESLG and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLG and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer