ESIM vs. SPDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.

Performance

ESIM vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESIM having a 16.15% return and SPDW slightly lower at 15.36%.

ESIM

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 7.18%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPDW

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 6M: 18.10%
• 1Y: 31.87%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 10.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIM vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESIM Eventide International ETF	16.15%	2.23%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	15.36%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIM and SPDW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

ESIM vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 61
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIM vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIM	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.89	0.24	+2.65

Drawdowns

ESIM vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and SPDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIM	SPDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-60.02%	+48.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.56%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-12.91%	+10.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESIM	SPDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	15.58%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	16.49%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	17.25%	-1.18%

ESIM vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIM vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SPDW's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESIM Eventide International ETF	0.19%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	2.86%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIM and SPDW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ESIM and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ESIM or SPDW?

On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIM or SPDW?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESIM or SPDW?

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.19% for ESIM.

What is the main difference between ESIM and SPDW?

They also come from different issuers: Eventide and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.04% for SPDW.