PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGN vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGN vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ESGN has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.05%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.


ESGN

1D
0.19%
1M
5.03%
6M
6.69%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
10.17%

VYM

1D
0.51%
1M
2.08%
6M
9.09%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$574.94K$759.83K$688.70K
$204.09M$201.36M$203.61M

ESGN vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
12.31%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.80%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and VYM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016

0.62

The correlation between ESGN and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGN
VYM

Industrials

15.8%
12.6%

Financial Services

15.4%
21.0%

Energy

13.0%
8.6%

Utilities

9.3%
5.7%

Technology

7.0%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.8%

Healthcare

3.9%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
8.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

1.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.0%

Industrials

ESGN
15.8%
VYM
12.6%

Financial Services

ESGN
15.4%
VYM
21.0%

Energy

ESGN
13.0%
VYM
8.6%

Utilities

ESGN
9.3%
VYM
5.7%

Technology

ESGN
7.0%
VYM
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGN
6.6%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

ESGN
3.9%
VYM
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

ESGN
3.5%
VYM
8.1%

Basic Materials

ESGN
1.9%
VYM
3.3%

Communication Services

ESGN
1.2%
VYM
3.0%

Real Estate

ESGN
0.2%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGN vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGN vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGNVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.83

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

14.40

-4.57

ESGN vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-56.98%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-6.69%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-14.46%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-15.84%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-35.21%

-6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.64%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-7.14%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.78%

+1.18%

Volatility

ESGN vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.40%. This indicates that ESGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

2.40%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

7.43%

+4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

10.19%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

13.87%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.30%

+0.08%

ESGN vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGN vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than VYM's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.30%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.23%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGN and VYM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGN has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to VYM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.68% vs 10.05% for ESGN. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 2.23% for VYM.

ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGN and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer