PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGN vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGN vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.


ESGN

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.18%
YTD
7.02%
6M
10.22%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGN vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
7.02%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and VEA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016

0.82

The correlation between ESGN and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGN
VEA

Industrials

15.8%
19.2%

Financial Services

15.4%
23.3%

Energy

13.0%
5.4%

Utilities

9.3%
3.3%

Technology

7.0%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.5%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
7.5%

Communication Services

1.2%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.7%

Industrials

ESGN
15.8%
VEA
19.2%

Financial Services

ESGN
15.4%
VEA
23.3%

Energy

ESGN
13.0%
VEA
5.4%

Utilities

ESGN
9.3%
VEA
3.3%

Technology

ESGN
7.0%
VEA
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGN
6.6%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

ESGN
3.9%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

ESGN
3.5%
VEA
5.6%

Basic Materials

ESGN
1.9%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

ESGN
1.2%
VEA
3.4%

Real Estate

ESGN
0.2%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGN vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGN vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGNVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.81

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

10.94

-0.97

ESGN vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGNVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.09

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.58

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.25

+0.36

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-60.68%

+18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-11.63%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-13.45%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-29.71%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-0.90%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-13.29%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.98%

-0.39%

Volatility

ESGN vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) is 3.92%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that ESGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.66%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

13.32%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

15.66%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

16.55%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.36%

-1.05%

ESGN vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGN vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.22%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGN and VEA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to ESGN (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 11.72% vs 9.60% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ESGN has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGN and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer