PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ESGG has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 13.88%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


ESGG

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.86%
6M
11.46%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
13.88%
ALL TIME*
13.83%

VUG

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.39%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$98.11K$106.47K$85.00K
$556.11M$661.72M$650.91M

ESGG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.33%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.02%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and VUG is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.82

The correlation between ESGG and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
VUG

Technology

40.0%
56.2%

Financial Services

19.5%
3.8%

Healthcare

14.1%
4.7%

Industrials

6.8%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
11.5%

Energy

4.2%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.5%

Utilities

1.4%
0.7%

Communication Services

1.3%
15.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.0%

Technology

ESGG
40.0%
VUG
56.2%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.5%
VUG
3.8%

Healthcare

ESGG
14.1%
VUG
4.7%

Industrials

ESGG
6.8%
VUG
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.4%
VUG
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.4%
VUG
11.5%

Energy

ESGG
4.2%
VUG
0.3%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.0%
VUG
0.5%

Utilities

ESGG
1.4%
VUG
0.7%

Communication Services

ESGG
1.3%
VUG
15.4%

Real Estate

ESGG
1.1%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGGVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.78

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

2.47

+9.19

ESGG vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-50.68%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-16.53%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-22.85%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-35.61%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-35.61%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-5.53%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-7.08%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

5.20%

-3.03%

Volatility

ESGG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 4.17%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

5.58%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

14.24%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

17.74%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

22.49%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

21.55%

-5.01%

ESGG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.29%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.40%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and VUG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to ESGG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.38% vs 13.88% for ESGG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.

ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.03% for VUG.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer