ESGG vs. EFAX
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while EFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG returned 12.78%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for EFAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAX.
Performance
ESGG vs. EFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than EFAX's 6.64% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGG vs. EFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 14.72% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -18.66% | 23.76% | 17.32% | 29.10% | -8.44% | 23.60% |
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 6.64% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 9.57% | 23.52% | -14.78% | 23.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and EFAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ESGG and EFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGG vs. EFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG
EFAX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
ESGG
EFAX
Financial Services
ESGG
EFAX
Healthcare
ESGG
EFAX
Industrials
ESGG
EFAX
Consumer Defensive
ESGG
EFAX
Energy
ESGG
EFAX
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG
EFAX
Basic Materials
ESGG
EFAX
Utilities
ESGG
EFAX
Real Estate
ESGG
EFAX
Communication Services
ESGG
EFAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. EFAX — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
EFAX
ESGG vs. EFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGG | EFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.52 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 5.61 | +9.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGG | EFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.20 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.45 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.53 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. EFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum EFAX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and EFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | EFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -32.53% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -12.38% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -13.52% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -31.67% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.83% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -6.97% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 3.34% | -1.29% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. EFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 3.76%, while SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | EFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 5.24% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 13.11% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 15.67% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 16.66% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.10% | -0.59% |
ESGG vs. EFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. EFAX - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than EFAX's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.22% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG and EFAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ESGG (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs EFAX's -32.53%.
On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.
EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.21% for ESGG.
ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.20% for EFAX.
ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and EFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer