ESGG vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
ESGG and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGG is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2016. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both ESGG and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESGG vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGG vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | -2.46% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -18.66% | 23.76% | 17.32% | 29.10% | -8.44% | 3.06% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | -1.41% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 28.95% | 20.91% | 35.58% | -2.55% | 4.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's -1.41% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
OMFL
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGG vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
OMFL
ESGG vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGG | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.83 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.28 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.49 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 7.05 | +0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGG | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.83 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.45 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.63 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and OMFL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESGG vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than OMFL's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.43% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.86% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and OMFL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -33.24% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -10.00% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -22.44% | -5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -5.20% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -4.89% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.11% | +0.40% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 5.24%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.24% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 10.02% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 16.72% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 16.82% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 20.26% | -3.71% |