PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. TDTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than TDTT's 1.81% return.


ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and TDTT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.11

The correlation between ESGG and TDTT shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGGTDTTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.54

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.69

4.20

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

5.17

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.38

16.59

-1.21

ESGG vs. TDTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the TDTT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and TDTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGGTDTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.54

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.69

+0.16

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and TDTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGTDTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-6.97%

-25.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-0.90%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-1.53%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-6.97%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.14%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-1.60%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.28%

+1.77%

Volatility

ESGG vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) at 0.46%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGTDTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

0.46%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

1.21%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

1.85%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

3.67%

+12.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

3.38%

+13.13%

ESGG vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than TDTT's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than TDTT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and TDTT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGG has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to TDTT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs TDTT's -6.97%.

On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 2.85% for TDTT. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTT has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 1.21% for ESGG.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TDTT is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.18% for TDTT.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and TDTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer