PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 2.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TDTT having a 3.11% annualized return and STIP not far ahead at 3.18%.


TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and STIP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2011

0.83

The correlation between TDTT and STIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTTSTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.69

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

6.76

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.59

26.37

-9.77

TDTT vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTTSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

3.23

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.23

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

1.30

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.07

-0.38

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-5.50%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-0.69%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-0.95%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

-5.50%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

-5.50%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.03%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-0.99%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.18%

+0.10%

Volatility

TDTT vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.40%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

0.99%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.46%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

2.75%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

2.45%

+0.93%

TDTT vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTT vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TDTT and STIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TDTT has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs STIP's -5.50%.

On 10-year performance, STIP leads with 3.18% vs 3.11% for TDTT. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, STIP has performed better with a 3.18% return vs 3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TDTT.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.30% for STIP.

TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while STIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.06% for STIP.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer