PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TDTT has underperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 3.10%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.


TDTT

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
3.10%

BKLN

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.89%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.76%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.16%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and BKLN is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2011

0.08

The correlation between TDTT and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTTBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

1.55

+3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

6.11

+9.92

TDTT vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTTBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.73

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.15

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.66

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-24.17%

+17.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-3.07%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-3.55%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

-7.31%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

-24.17%

+17.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.29%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-1.09%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.78%

-0.50%

Volatility

TDTT vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.42%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.42%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

2.52%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

2.75%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

4.47%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

6.43%

-3.05%

TDTT vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDTT vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than BKLN's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.62%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.55%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and BKLN have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTT has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to BKLN (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 10-year performance, BKLN leads with 4.26% vs 3.10% for TDTT. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 4.26% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.55% for TDTT.

TDTT is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BKLN is High Yield Bonds. TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while BKLN tracks S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.65% for BKLN.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer