TDTT vs. FLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).
TDTT and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDTT is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. Both TDTT and FLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TDTT or FLTR.
Correlation
The correlation between TDTT and FLTR is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TDTT vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TDTT:
1.45
FLTR:
7.37
TDTT:
2.11
FLTR:
12.02
TDTT:
1.27
FLTR:
3.89
TDTT:
1.65
FLTR:
9.97
TDTT:
6.69
FLTR:
112.09
TDTT:
0.56%
FLTR:
0.07%
TDTT:
2.59%
FLTR:
1.00%
TDTT:
-6.97%
FLTR:
-17.84%
TDTT:
-1.40%
FLTR:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TDTT has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.83% annualized return.
TDTT
3.78%
-0.31%
1.99%
3.78%
3.20%
2.47%
FLTR
7.16%
0.56%
3.08%
7.34%
3.46%
2.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDTT vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TDTT vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TDTT vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than FLTR's 5.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.02% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.19% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 5.99% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
TDTT vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and FLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TDTT vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.16%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.