ESGG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ESGG is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ESGG returned 24.72% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

ESGG

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 11.57%
• YTD: 13.53%
• 1Y: 24.72%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 11.93%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	13.53%	24.01%	-0.13%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and MSTZ is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

ESGG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG

ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 74
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.92	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.45	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.35	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	6.53	+5.00

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-99.38%	+67.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-84.89%	+75.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-97.39%	+95.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-94.53%	+89.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	43.51%	-41.36%

Volatility

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 4.24%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	56.56%	-52.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	135.11%	-124.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.88%	148.53%	-135.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	171.02%	-154.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	171.02%	-154.51%

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	1.30%	1.39%	1.84%	1.73%	1.83%	1.34%	1.36%	1.94%	2.12%	1.71%	0.87%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ESGG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESGG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to ESGG (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ESGG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 24.72% for ESGG. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 24.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGG or MSTZ?

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGG or MSTZ?

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between ESGG and MSTZ?

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.