PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
-3.94%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-5.17%14.04%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.


ESG

1D
2.39%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-3.94%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

-0.14

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

-0.14

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.98

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

-0.19

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.61

-0.35

+5.96

ESG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

-0.14

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

-0.08

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.15

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and CCOR is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ESG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
1.01%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-22.99%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-9.17%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-22.99%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-17.23%

+10.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-7.07%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.95%

-2.34%

Volatility

ESG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that ESG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESGCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

2.17%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

5.44%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

10.74%

+6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

11.13%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

10.81%

+7.65%