PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQT vs. COHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQT vs. COHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than COHR's 107.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed COHR with an annualized return of 2.96%, while COHR has yielded a comparatively higher 34.48% annualized return.


EQT

1D
1.22%
1M
-8.63%
YTD
-3.62%
6M
-3.11%
1Y
-10.66%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
21.83%
10Y*
2.96%

COHR

1D
-7.50%
1M
0.09%
YTD
107.41%
6M
118.50%
1Y
374.01%
3Y*
91.08%
5Y*
40.73%
10Y*
34.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQT vs. COHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQT
EQT Corporation
-3.62%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
107.41%94.84%117.62%24.02%-48.63%-10.04%125.60%3.73%-30.86%58.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and COHR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.19

The correlation between EQT and COHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

EQT:

$5.40

COHR:

$1.64K

PE Ratio

EQT:

9.51

COHR:

0.23

PEG Ratio

EQT:

0.08

COHR:

0.04

PS Ratio

EQT:

3.18

COHR:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQT:

$10.03B

COHR:

$1.81T

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQT:

$6.43B

COHR:

$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQT:

$7.48B

COHR:

$960.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQT vs. COHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQT vs. COHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQTCOHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.54

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

14.22

-14.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

38.88

-39.79

EQT vs. COHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the COHR Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and COHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQT vs. COHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than COHR's maximum drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and COHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQTCOHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-80.89%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.08%

-26.52%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-54.85%

+23.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

-62.87%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.28%

-72.22%

-16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.16%

-10.33%

-13.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-35.01%

+11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.68%

9.68%

+2.00%

Volatility

EQT vs. COHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.60%, while Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQTCOHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

29.36%

-20.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.14%

57.33%

-36.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.45%

74.29%

-41.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.78%

61.77%

-18.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.92%

56.67%

-7.75%

Dividends

EQT vs. COHR - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.27%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%

Financials

EQT vs. COHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Coherent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
3.38B
1.81T
(EQT) Total Revenue
(COHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQT vs. COHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EQT Corporation and Coherent, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.4%
0
Portfolio components
EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

COHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

COHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

COHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a net income of 191.40B and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQT and COHR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COHR has higher volatility (29.36%) compared to EQT (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs COHR's -80.89%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQT and COHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer