EPV vs. QINT
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPV returned -18.33%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for QINT. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for QINT.
Performance
EPV vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -12.85% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 8.57% return.
EPV
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- -12.85%
- 6M
- -12.79%
- 1Y
- -28.90%
- 3Y*
- -25.19%
- 5Y*
- -18.33%
- 10Y*
- -23.45%
QINT
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 25.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
EPV vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -12.85% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -37.31% | -36.11% | 25.23% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 8.57% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.95% | 23.46% | -14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and QINT is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | -0.94 |
The correlation between EPV and QINT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. QINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
QINT
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
QINT
Basic Materials
EPV
-
QINT
Communication Services
EPV
-
QINT
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
QINT
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
QINT
Energy
EPV
-
QINT
Healthcare
EPV
-
QINT
Industrials
EPV
-
QINT
Real Estate
EPV
-
QINT
Technology
EPV
-
QINT
Utilities
EPV
-
QINT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
QINT
EPV vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 2.22 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 8.95 | -10.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than QINT's maximum drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and QINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -33.86% | -65.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -11.41% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.94% | -13.56% | -52.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.48% | -33.86% | -45.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.36% | -2.47% | -96.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -7.50% | -80.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 2.83% | +16.47% |
Volatility
EPV vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) at 5.26%. This indicates that EPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 5.26% | +5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.32% | 13.09% | +14.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.00% | 15.42% | +16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 16.33% | +19.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.02% | 18.08% | +18.94% |
EPV vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than QINT's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.85% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 3.81% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and QINT have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPV has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to QINT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.38% vs QINT's -33.86%.
On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 8.94% vs -18.33% for EPV. On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 8.94% return vs -18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 3.81% for QINT.
EPV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.39% for QINT.
QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and QINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer