EPV vs. TQQQ
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPV returned -22.79%/yr vs 39.46%/yr for TQQQ. Their -0.66 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EPV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -18.89% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EPV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -22.79%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.
EPV
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- -18.89%
- 1Y
- -34.32%
- 3Y*
- -24.89%
- 5Y*
- -19.22%
- 10Y*
- -22.79%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.50%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 56.87%
- 3Y*
- 43.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 39.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $313.99K | $282.71K | $436.94K | |
| $4.37B | $4.57B | $5.33B |
EPV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -18.89% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -37.31% | -36.11% | 32.22% | -39.79% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 23.06% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and TQQQ is -0.63, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.66 |
The correlation between EPV and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
TQQQ
Basic Materials
EPV
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
EPV
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
TQQQ
Energy
EPV
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
EPV
-
TQQQ
Industrials
EPV
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
EPV
-
TQQQ
Technology
EPV
-
TQQQ
Utilities
EPV
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
TQQQ
EPV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.17 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 1.29 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 3.60 | -5.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -81.66% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -36.97% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.48% | -58.04% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.41% | -81.66% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.01% | -81.66% | -11.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.40% | -25.74% | -73.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.47% | -18.49% | -69.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.81% | 13.24% | +8.57% |
Volatility
EPV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 10.17%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 20.41% | -10.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.49% | 47.79% | -19.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.50% | 57.62% | -25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.98% | 68.04% | -32.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 66.57% | -29.68% |
EPV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EPV and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EPV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.93% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.58% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to EPV (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.41% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs -22.79% for EPV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 10.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs -22.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPV and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.
EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer