EPV vs. TQQQ
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPV returned -22.51%/yr vs 42.27%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EPV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -13.88% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EPV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -22.51%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.27% annualized return.
EPV
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -13.88%
- 1Y
- -25.33%
- 3Y*
- -22.94%
- 5Y*
- -18.56%
- 10Y*
- -22.51%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- YTD
- 38.33%
- 1Y
- 74.65%
- 3Y*
- 50.58%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 42.27%
EPV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -13.88% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -37.31% | -36.11% | 32.22% | -39.79% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 38.33% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and TQQQ is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.66 |
The correlation between EPV and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
TQQQ
Basic Materials
EPV
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
EPV
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
TQQQ
Energy
EPV
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
EPV
-
TQQQ
Industrials
EPV
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
EPV
-
TQQQ
Technology
EPV
-
TQQQ
Utilities
EPV
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
TQQQ
EPV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.03 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 6.23 | -7.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -81.66% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.63% | -36.97% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.78% | -58.04% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.99% | -81.66% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.86% | -81.66% | -11.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.37% | -16.52% | -82.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.43% | -18.48% | -69.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.48% | 12.02% | +8.46% |
Volatility
EPV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 10.05%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 25.43%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 25.43% | -15.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.90% | 45.80% | -17.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 55.32% | -23.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 67.74% | -31.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.84% | 66.40% | -29.56% |
EPV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EPV and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EPV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than TQQQ's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.64% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.52% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (25.43%) compared to EPV (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.40% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.27% vs -22.51% for EPV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 10.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.27% return vs -22.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPV and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.52% for TQQQ.
EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer