EPV vs. GSID
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while GSID is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPV returned -19.47%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for GSID. At a correlation of -0.95, they often move in opposite directions. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GSID.
Performance
EPV vs. GSID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSID's 10.26% return.
EPV
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- -11.43%
- YTD
- -15.73%
- 1Y
- -28.32%
- 3Y*
- -23.66%
- 5Y*
- -19.47%
- 10Y*
- -22.64%
GSID
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
EPV vs. GSID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -15.73% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -52.84% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.26% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and GSID is -0.95, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | -0.95 |
The correlation between EPV and GSID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. GSID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
GSID
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
GSID
Basic Materials
EPV
-
GSID
Communication Services
EPV
-
GSID
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
GSID
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
GSID
Energy
EPV
-
GSID
Healthcare
EPV
-
GSID
Industrials
EPV
-
GSID
Real Estate
EPV
-
GSID
Technology
EPV
-
GSID
Utilities
EPV
-
GSID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. GSID — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
GSID
EPV vs. GSID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.98 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 7.32 | -8.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. GSID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than GSID's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and GSID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -29.89% | -69.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.63% | -11.34% | -22.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.78% | -13.96% | -52.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.99% | -29.89% | -50.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.38% | -1.12% | -98.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.44% | -5.64% | -82.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.77% | 3.06% | +17.71% |
Volatility
EPV vs. GSID - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) at 3.66%. This indicates that EPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 3.66% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.93% | 13.43% | +14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.14% | 15.62% | +16.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 16.32% | +19.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 16.30% | +20.52% |
EPV vs. GSID - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSID's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. GSID - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than GSID's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.74% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.47% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and GSID have a correlation of -0.95, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPV has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to GSID (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.40% vs GSID's -29.89%.
On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 9.10% vs -19.47% for EPV. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSID has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 9.10% return vs -19.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 2.47% for GSID.
EPV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GSID is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.20% for GSID.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and GSID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer