PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPU vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPU vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EPU having a 8.58% return and VO slightly higher at 8.64%. Over the past 10 years, EPU has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 13.41%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.


EPU

1D
-6.28%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
8.58%
6M
17.68%
1Y
64.72%
3Y*
41.90%
5Y*
22.72%
10Y*
13.41%

VO

1D
-2.06%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.01%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPU vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
8.58%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
8.64%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EPU and VO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.52

The correlation between EPU and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPU vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPU
VO

Basic Materials

52.7%
4.2%

Financial Services

28.8%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
8.6%

Real Estate

3.2%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.8%

Utilities

2.8%
8.3%

Industrials

2.8%
17.9%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.1%

Healthcare

1.2%
7.6%

Energy

-

8.5%

Technology

-

18.6%

Basic Materials

EPU
52.7%
VO
4.2%

Financial Services

EPU
28.8%
VO
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EPU
4.1%
VO
8.6%

Real Estate

EPU
3.2%
VO
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

EPU
3.0%
VO
4.8%

Utilities

EPU
2.8%
VO
8.3%

Industrials

EPU
2.8%
VO
17.9%

Communication Services

EPU
1.6%
VO
3.1%

Healthcare

EPU
1.2%
VO
7.6%

Energy

EPU

-

VO
8.5%

Technology

EPU

-

VO
18.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPU vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPU vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPUVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.11

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

8.04

+1.22

EPU vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPU and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPUVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.38

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.43

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.60

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.50

-0.07

Drawdowns

EPU vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPUVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-58.87%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-8.17%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-19.02%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-27.57%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

-39.37%

-11.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-2.06%

-14.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-7.86%

-10.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

2.14%

+4.88%

Volatility

EPU vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.68%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPUVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

3.68%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

9.46%

+16.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.03%

12.50%

+17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.20%

17.61%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

18.95%

+4.56%

EPU vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPU vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than VO's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.50%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.38%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPU and VO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to VO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 13.41% vs 11.29% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 13.41% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.38% for VO.

EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.03% for VO.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPU and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer