EPU vs. ILF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF).
EPU and ILF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EPU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2009. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. Both EPU and ILF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EPU or ILF.
Key characteristics
| EPU | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.62% | -5.54% |
| 1Y Return | 39.61% | 19.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.25% | 7.28% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.22% | 2.11% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.55% | 0.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.09 | 0.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.34% | 19.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.62% | -67.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.21% | -19.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and ILF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EPU vs. ILF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than ILF's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EPU has outperformed ILF with an annualized return of 4.55%, while ILF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPU vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ILF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EPU vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EPU vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than ILF's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 3.51% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.72% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 4.88% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.24% | 2.31% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
EPU vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and ILF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EPU vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) is 5.14%, while iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that EPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.