EPRF vs. PFLD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - EPRF tracks the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index while PFLD tracks the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -2.02%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for PFLD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.

Performance

EPRF vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 3.05% return.

EPRF

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: -4.59%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 1Y: -1.05%
• 3Y*: 3.16%
• 5Y*: -2.02%
• 10Y*: —

PFLD

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 1.98%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 4.65%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	-2.15%	2.69%	3.46%	9.43%	-20.68%	1.37%	7.38%	1.88%
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A	3.05%	1.44%	5.48%	8.16%	-12.73%	4.49%	5.34%	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and PFLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between EPRF and PFLD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EPRF vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF

EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 8
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

PFLD

PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 79
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPRF	PFLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.93	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	3.13	-3.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.37	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	2.76	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	12.96	-13.18

EPRF vs. PFLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the PFLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and PFLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PFLD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRF	PFLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-33.20%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-2.23%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-6.41%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.23%	-15.51%	-9.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	0.00%	-10.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-4.10%	-3.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.61%	0.48%	+4.13%

Volatility

EPRF vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.65%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPRF	PFLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	0.65%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.57%	2.28%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45%	3.20%	+4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.85%	7.50%	+4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	13.26%	+0.16%

EPRF vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPRF vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than PFLD's 5.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	6.17%	6.03%	6.13%	5.71%	5.67%	4.70%	4.92%	5.01%	5.27%	2.59%
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A	5.45%	6.52%	7.09%	7.09%	5.76%	4.52%	4.79%	0.82%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPRF and PFLD in my portfolio?

EPRF and PFLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPRF or PFLD?

EPRF has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to PFLD (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs PFLD's -33.20%.

Which ETF is better, EPRF or PFLD?

On 5-year performance, PFLD leads with 0.94% vs -2.02% for EPRF. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPRF or PFLD?

Over the 5-year period, PFLD has performed better with a 0.94% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPRF or PFLD?

PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPRF or PFLD?

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 5.45% for PFLD.

What is the main difference between EPRF and PFLD?

EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.45% for PFLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.