PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLD vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLD vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.60% return.


PFLD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.48%
6M
3.00%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*

DIVO

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.15%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.50%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLD vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
2.48%1.44%5.48%8.16%-12.73%4.49%5.34%1.04%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.60%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLD and DIVO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019

0.40

The correlation between PFLD and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFLD vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFLD
DIVO

Utilities

100.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.9%

Energy

-

6.8%

Financial Services

-

30.3%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

16.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

14.5%

Utilities

PFLD
100.0%
DIVO
2.0%

Basic Materials

PFLD

-

DIVO
4.1%

Communication Services

PFLD

-

DIVO
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PFLD

-

DIVO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

PFLD

-

DIVO
6.9%

Energy

PFLD

-

DIVO
6.8%

Financial Services

PFLD

-

DIVO
30.3%

Healthcare

PFLD

-

DIVO
6.7%

Industrials

PFLD

-

DIVO
16.2%

Real Estate

PFLD

-

DIVO

-

Technology

PFLD

-

DIVO
14.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLD vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLDDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.18

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

11.49

-0.22

PFLD vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLD and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLDDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.09

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.89

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.85

-0.68

Drawdowns

PFLD vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLDDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-30.04%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-5.95%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-12.12%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

-13.72%

-1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.97%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-2.61%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.64%

-1.14%

Volatility

PFLD vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 0.82%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLDDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

2.36%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

7.02%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

9.08%

-5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

11.95%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

14.84%

-1.47%

PFLD vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLD vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than DIVO's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.41%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.61%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLD and DIVO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVO has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to PFLD (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.63% vs 1.00% for PFLD. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 5.61% for PFLD.

PFLD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLD and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer