PFLD vs. SPHD
PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFLD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFLD returned 1.00%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
PFLD vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 6.80% return.
PFLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 11.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
PFLD vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.48% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 6.80% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLD and SPHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFLD and SPHD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFLD vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFLD
SPHD
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
PFLD
SPHD
Basic Materials
PFLD
-
SPHD
-
Communication Services
PFLD
-
SPHD
Consumer Cyclical
PFLD
-
SPHD
Consumer Defensive
PFLD
-
SPHD
Energy
PFLD
-
SPHD
Financial Services
PFLD
-
SPHD
Healthcare
PFLD
-
SPHD
Industrials
PFLD
-
SPHD
Real Estate
PFLD
-
SPHD
Technology
PFLD
-
SPHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLD vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
PFLD
SPHD
PFLD vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLD | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.62 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 4.02 | +7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLD | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.07 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.42 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.59 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
PFLD vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLD | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -41.39% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -7.33% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.41% | -13.29% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.51% | -19.50% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -3.18% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -4.70% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 2.94% | -2.44% |
Volatility
PFLD vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 0.82%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLD | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 3.39% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 7.66% | -5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 11.12% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 14.17% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 17.65% | -4.28% |
PFLD vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFLD vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than SPHD's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.61% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.52% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFLD and SPHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHD has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PFLD (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 5-year performance, SPHD leads with 5.97% vs 1.00% for PFLD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.
PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.52% for SPHD.
PFLD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPHD is Dividend. PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.30% for SPHD.
PFLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFLD and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer