EPRF vs. PFFD
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - EPRF tracks the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index while PFFD tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -1.97%/yr vs -0.16%/yr for PFFD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for PFFD.
Performance
EPRF vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PFFD's 2.29% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. PFFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.39% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -5.58% | -0.20% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and PFFD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EPRF and PFFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPRF vs. PFFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRF
PFFD
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPRF
PFFD
Real Estate
EPRF
PFFD
Basic Materials
EPRF
-
PFFD
Communication Services
EPRF
-
PFFD
Consumer Cyclical
EPRF
-
PFFD
Consumer Defensive
EPRF
-
PFFD
-
Energy
EPRF
-
PFFD
-
Healthcare
EPRF
-
PFFD
Industrials
EPRF
-
PFFD
Technology
EPRF
-
PFFD
Utilities
EPRF
-
PFFD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. PFFD — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
PFFD
EPRF vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.29 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 3.81 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.07 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | -0.01 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.21 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PFFD drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -30.93% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -5.97% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -10.84% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -24.45% | -0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -3.68% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -6.59% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 2.01% | +2.00% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) have volatilities of 2.14% and 2.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.09% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 5.32% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 7.19% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 10.98% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 12.76% | +0.73% |
EPRF vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than PFFD's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and PFFD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs PFFD's -30.93%.
On 5-year performance, PFFD leads with -0.16% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFD has performed better with a -0.16% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 6.18% for EPRF.
EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.23% for PFFD.
PFFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and PFFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer