PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPIN vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPIN vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 35.42% return.


EPIN

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.18%
YTD
21.76%
6M
21.92%
1Y
37.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
-3.22%
1M
-16.18%
YTD
35.42%
6M
33.45%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
21.76%14.36%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
35.42%-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and USL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPIN vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN
EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPINUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.39

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.22

3.60

+8.62

EPIN vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPINUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-89.06%

+77.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-20.18%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-48.64%

+45.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-61.39%

+59.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

7.78%

-4.68%

Volatility

EPIN vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) have volatilities of 8.48% and 8.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPINUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

8.59%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

24.45%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

28.66%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

30.28%

-11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

32.34%

-13.92%

EPIN vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPIN vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPIN and USL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to EPIN (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 37.79% vs 27.96% for USL. On fees, EPIN is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, EPIN has been the lower-risk option at 8.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 37.79% return vs 27.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPIN is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

EPIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

EPIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.88% for USL.

EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPIN and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer