EPIN vs. ICOW
EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EPIN is actively managed, while ICOW is passively managed. Over the past year, EPIN returned 37.79% vs 26.63% for ICOW. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPIN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
EPIN vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly higher than ICOW's 8.24% return.
EPIN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- 1Y
- 37.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- —
EPIN vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 21.76% | 14.36% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.24% | 18.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPIN and ICOW is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EPIN and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPIN vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPIN
ICOW
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
EPIN
ICOW
Industrials
EPIN
ICOW
Financial Services
EPIN
ICOW
-
Basic Materials
EPIN
ICOW
Healthcare
EPIN
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
EPIN
ICOW
Energy
EPIN
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
EPIN
ICOW
Communication Services
EPIN
ICOW
Real Estate
EPIN
-
ICOW
-
Utilities
EPIN
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPIN vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
EPIN
ICOW
EPIN vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPIN | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.20 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 10.66 | +1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPIN vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPIN | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -43.49% | +31.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | -8.35% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -8.35% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -7.56% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.50% | +0.60% |
Volatility
EPIN vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 5.83%. This indicates that EPIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPIN | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 5.83% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 11.91% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 14.75% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 16.77% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 18.50% | -0.08% |
EPIN vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPIN vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than ICOW's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.36% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPIN and ICOW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPIN has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to ICOW (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 37.79% vs 26.63% for ICOW. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 37.79% return vs 26.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.65% for EPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.65% for ICOW.
EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPIN and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer