EOG vs. CSL
EOG (EOG Resources, Inc.) and CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) are both stocks. EOG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, EOG returned 8.50%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for CSL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EOG vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EOG achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than CSL's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EOG has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 8.50%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.
EOG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 28.71%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
CSL
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
EOG vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 32.39% | -11.37% | 4.30% | -2.03% | 56.88% | 88.62% | -38.64% | -2.82% | -18.66% | 7.47% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 8.12% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOG and CSL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1989 | 0.25 |
The correlation between EOG and CSL shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EOG:
$73.11B
CSL:
$14.13B
EOG:
$10.16
CSL:
$17.08
EOG:
13.45
CSL:
20.13
EOG:
1.71
CSL:
0.52
EOG:
3.15
CSL:
2.93
EOG:
2.37
CSL:
8.55
EOG:
$23.48B
CSL:
$4.98B
EOG:
$11.38B
CSL:
$1.41B
EOG:
$14.73B
CSL:
$1.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOG vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank
EOG
CSL
EOG vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EOG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.01 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | -0.16 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | -0.27 | +2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EOG vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOG drawdown since its inception was -77.13%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOG and CSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.13% | -64.56% | -12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.51% | -31.67% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.72% | -37.72% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.42% | -37.72% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.13% | -38.68% | -38.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -27.08% | +18.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -12.32% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 18.90% | -9.35% |
Volatility
EOG vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) is 8.72%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that EOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 10.87% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 24.85% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.17% | 36.22% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 30.81% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 29.68% | +9.45% |
Dividends
EOG vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
EOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than CSL's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.28% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 2.95% | 3.76% | 2.97% | 4.80% | 6.79% | 5.19% | 2.83% | 1.21% | 0.87% | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.95% |
Financials
EOG vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EOG Resources, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EOG vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison
EOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.60B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
EOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EOG Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EOG and CSL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to EOG (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOG dropped -77.13% vs CSL's -64.56%.
EOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EOG and CSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer