CSL vs. ROP
CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) and ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while ROP operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CSL returned 14.60%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for ROP. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CSL vs. ROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than ROP's -11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed ROP with an annualized return of 14.60%, while ROP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
ROP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- -11.32%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -6.71%
- 5Y*
- -3.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.98M | $195.31M | $163.99M | |
| $372.67M | $328.64M | $381.16M |
CSL vs. ROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 13.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | -11.32% | -13.85% | -4.11% | 26.92% | -11.64% | 14.69% | 22.39% | 33.66% | 3.51% | 42.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and ROP is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 1992 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSL and ROP has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CSL:
$14.56B
ROP:
$39.56B
CSL:
$17.39
ROP:
$23.66
CSL:
20.69
ROP:
16.56
CSL:
0.54
ROP:
1.96
CSL:
2.94
ROP:
5.01
CSL:
9.08
ROP:
2.15
CSL:
$5.10B
ROP:
$8.28B
CSL:
$865.80M
ROP:
$5.76B
CSL:
$1.15B
ROP:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. ROP — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
ROP
CSL vs. ROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSL | ROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.83 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.67 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | -1.02 | +1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSL vs. ROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than ROP's maximum drawdown of -58.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and ROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | ROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -58.94% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -42.04% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -46.51% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -46.51% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -46.51% | +7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.66% | -33.22% | +9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -11.54% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.31% | 28.12% | -12.81% |
Volatility
CSL vs. ROP - Volatility Comparison
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a higher volatility of 15.99% compared to Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) at 13.55%. This indicates that CSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | ROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.99% | 13.55% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.09% | 23.40% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.89% | 28.73% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 22.28% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 23.65% | +6.58% |
Dividends
CSL vs. ROP - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than ROP's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Financials
CSL vs. ROP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Roper Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSL vs. ROP - Profitability Comparison
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of -363.20M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.1%.
ROP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 352.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
ROP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 584.70M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 255.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
ROP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.17B and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSL and ROP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to ROP (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSL dropped -64.56% vs ROP's -58.94%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSL and ROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer