CSL vs. GGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Graco Inc. (GGG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSL or GGG.
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and GGG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CSL vs. GGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CSL:
0.78
GGG:
-0.03
CSL:
1.22
GGG:
0.09
CSL:
1.16
GGG:
1.01
CSL:
0.91
GGG:
-0.03
CSL:
2.87
GGG:
-0.05
CSL:
7.51%
GGG:
10.11%
CSL:
27.63%
GGG:
18.98%
CSL:
-64.58%
GGG:
-68.77%
CSL:
-22.31%
GGG:
-12.27%
Fundamentals
CSL:
$16.90B
GGG:
$13.89B
CSL:
$18.64
GGG:
$2.83
CSL:
20.00
GGG:
29.08
CSL:
1.08
GGG:
2.78
CSL:
$3.88B
GGG:
$1.56B
CSL:
$1.43B
GGG:
$843.18M
CSL:
$1.06B
GGG:
$501.71M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than GGG's -2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed GGG with an annualized return of 16.28%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.
CSL
1.07%
-13.49%
-10.16%
22.27%
19.85%
16.28%
GGG
-2.37%
-8.96%
5.07%
0.05%
10.78%
13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSL vs. GGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSL
GGG
CSL vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSL vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GGG's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 0.99% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% | 1.04% |
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
CSL vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.58%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and GGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSL vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 5.01%. This indicates that CSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CSL vs. GGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities