PortfoliosLab logo
CSL vs. GGG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CSL and GGG is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CSL vs. GGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Graco Inc. (GGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSL:

-0.05

GGG:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

CSL:

0.12

GGG:

0.56

Omega Ratio

CSL:

1.01

GGG:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

CSL:

-0.06

GGG:

0.30

Martin Ratio

CSL:

-0.13

GGG:

0.92

Ulcer Index

CSL:

16.63%

GGG:

6.87%

Daily Std Dev

CSL:

30.85%

GGG:

22.29%

Max Drawdown

CSL:

-64.58%

GGG:

-68.77%

Current Drawdown

CSL:

-14.63%

GGG:

-6.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSL:

$17.67B

GGG:

$14.58B

EPS

CSL:

$17.93

GGG:

$2.83

PE Ratio

CSL:

22.78

GGG:

30.83

PEG Ratio

CSL:

1.22

GGG:

2.80

PS Ratio

CSL:

3.53

GGG:

6.79

PB Ratio

CSL:

8.16

GGG:

5.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSL:

$5.00B

GGG:

$2.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSL:

$1.85B

GGG:

$1.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSL:

$1.30B

GGG:

$662.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than GGG's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed GGG with an annualized return of 16.76%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.32% annualized return.


CSL

YTD

11.06%

1M

15.63%

6M

-8.02%

1Y

-1.45%

5Y*

30.34%

10Y*

16.76%

GGG

YTD

4.22%

1M

11.05%

6M

-1.98%

1Y

6.46%

5Y*

14.97%

10Y*

15.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSL vs. GGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSL is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSL is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSL is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSL is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSL is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSL is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGG is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGG is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGG is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSL vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the GGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSL and GGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CSL vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison

CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than GGG's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
0.98%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%1.04%
GGG
Graco Inc.
1.21%1.21%1.08%1.25%0.93%0.97%1.23%1.27%2.65%1.59%1.67%2.40%

Drawdowns

CSL vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.58%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and GGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CSL vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 6.81%. This indicates that CSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CSL vs. GGG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.10B
528.28M
(CSL) Total Revenue
(GGG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSL vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Graco Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
35.2%
52.6%
(CSL) Gross Margin
(GGG) Gross Margin
CSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 385.70M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.

GGG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 277.73M and revenue of 528.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

CSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 183.60M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

GGG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 144.01M and revenue of 528.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.3%.

CSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 143.30M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

GGG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 124.10M and revenue of 528.28M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.